View Single Post
  #9  
Old Thu Jan 24, 2013, 02:37 AM
MDSPerth MDSPerth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Cuadra View Post
Nigel,

I understand how you feel you're in a holding pattern and can't get on with your life with this hanging over you, and I wish the right choice was clearer. It's wise to gather all the information you can, and opinions from other patients can help, but ultimately the most important voices are your own, your wife's, and the doctors you most trust.

If you could live with low counts without needing treatment of any kind, I'd be inclined to favor waiting a bit longer in case you find a better match. I think that having a young son is another reason to wait a bit longer, but the long-term outcome is more important than the short term, and that against favors treatment over wait-and-watch.

I wouldn't wait just because transplant techniques and success rates improve over time, since that's a slow process. Waiting also runs the risk that your sister could become medically unavailable for one reason or another.

The need for transfusions is the main factor that would lead me to favor a transplant in your situation. It's not a sustainable condition for life and statistically a history of transfusions reduces transplant success rates.

If that's the #1 reason for a transplant, the #1 opposing reason is your lack of a better match. I'd be quite concerned having nothing better than a haplo match, and I think those two factors are what put you in this dilemma. I don't know what the statistics show for haplo transplants, especially for those in your age group, and you can't trust statistics based on data from years past to represent your current chances of success very accurately. However, if it was me I'd ask the treatment center or a national agency to provide me with whatever statistics they have, to give me a better basis for considering or rejecting that choice. We know that a close match from an unrelated donor would be better than a half-match, but how much better?

Is the Australian Organ and Tissue Authority the agency that's been searching for a better match for you? Since they haven't even existed in their current form for 10 years, do you know for certain that all of the international registries have been searched, not just your national registry? If you don't mind my asking, were your parents from very different backgrounds, and that's the reason for your rare HLA tissue type? Or are your ancestors from a small community? I'm wondering if with enough effort, backing, funding, support, and publicity you could get a number of bone marrow registration drives going among certain geographic, national, or ethnic communities. That's what Krissy Kobata is doing with her search for a donor among those with the same mixed ethnicity.

You didn't mention trying other drugs. Has your doctor suggested that?
Hi Neil

Think this is more likely the Australian marrow body http://www.abmdr.org.au/.

Things in Australia seem to move a lot slower than in the USA - but then in general, we are probably behind the rest of the developed world in the number of people willing to donate organs

Paul was told he his HLA typing was not unusual, but here we are six months out and still looking - patience is a virtue.

Good luck with the hunt Nigel.

Regards
Sandi
__________________
Sandi, partner of Paul 62, diagnosed MDS Intermediate 2; July 2012. Pancytopenia, Cytogenetics -7 +8 Chromosomes. Low Blast cell count. Currently on EPO & G-CSF and having great response. MUD found will be admitted to Royal Perth Hospital 27 March 2013 to start SCT process.
Reply With Quote