View Single Post
  #2  
Old Wed Sep 12, 2012, 08:29 PM
DanL DanL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 590
Donna,

This is a very good question.

Per the NIH:
Cases are attributed to prior therapy based on circumstantial evidence, such as the following: 1) presence of typical clonal cytogenetic abnormalities, 2) significant exposure to leukemogenic therapy (e.g., at least one cycle), and 3) sufficient latency from exposure to diagnosis of t-MDS (e.g., at least six months).

A high rate of MDS is found in patients who have had prior treatement that includes total body irradiation, alkalyting agents, or topoisomerase inhibitors.

Loss of material from chromosomes 5 and/or 7 is detectable in up to 70% of t-MDS/AML patients, often with other abnormalities in a complex karyotype. The same pattern of cytogenetic abnormalities occur in de novo MDS, but at much lower frequency.

The article that I picked this information up from is fairly complex, but does a good job of explaining what the rationale for believient that MDS is therapy related or not.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2832708/

I hope this helps.
Dan
__________________
MDS RCMD w/grade 2-3 fibrosis. Allo-MUD Feb 26, 2014. Relapsed August 2014. Free and clear of MDS since November 2014 after treatment with Vidaza and Rituxan. Experiencing autoimmune attack on CNS thought to be GVHD, some gut, skin and ocular cGVHD. Neuropathy over 80% of body.
Reply With Quote