That article makes no sense to me and I can't understand how such a prestigious group would perform BMT's at all for those over 60 given those findings. When I first read it a few months ago I thought it was from 1999. If the net benefit for low risk is -36 months(negative 36) or whatever and the net benefit for high risk is 8 months then why subject someone to the recovery process of a BMT. How many people would knowingly go through the BMT, the recovery to buy 8 months?
|