|
As a Child Protection Services worker, the bottom line is always in the 'best interest of the child'. That said, if the child is not neglected or abused and her needs of food, housing, schooling, health and emotional care are being met.. I could see no reason why a judge would see any benefit in removing a child from her primary parent. Removal is always the very last recourse, after supports and interventions are first put in place. (counseling, day care, cleaning aid, home health nurses, etc. Custody battles rarely if ever benefit the child
__________________
f68 MDS; abmt 1/12. ABO mismatch 11 mos. (70) transf. Ferr 3-5k. 8 phlebot. AGVHD to CGVHD. skin,eyes. lungs as of 10/13. muscle weakness &osteo long term steroids.photopheresis 2x wk as of 3-15.pred 20 eod,acyclovir, mepron, voriconazole, pantropazole, lisinopril, montelukast, anoro, azithromycin.
|