Home         Forums  

Go Back   Marrowforums > Bone Marrow Failure Diseases > MDS
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

MDS Myelodysplastic syndromes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sat Jul 7, 2012, 10:21 PM
Greg H Greg H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 660
Dacogen

Hi all!

This could be my imagination, but it seems like I'm seeing a lot of folks lately on marrowforums who are being started on Dacogen instead of Vidaza. I know, early on, there was a definite preference for Vidaza, because the trial that got it approved by the FDA showed better results than the somewhat flawed trial for Dacogen.

I'm wondering if something has happened that I missed to flip this on its head and make Dacogen the preferred therapy. I have to admit that I didn't keep up with my reading as well as I should have while I was taking a vacation from thinking about MDS. So maybe I missed something.

If I did, I'll bet Birgitta or DanL caught it. Someone fill me in on why so many folks seem to be getting Dacogen instead of Vidaza.

Take Care!

Greg
__________________
Greg, 59, dx MDS RCMD Int-1 03/10, 8+ & Dup1(q21q31). NIH Campath 11/2010. Non-responder. Tiny telomeres. TERT mutation. Danazol at NIH 12/11. TX independent 7/12. Pancreatitis 4/15. 15% blasts 4/16. DX RAEB-2. Beginning Vidaza to prep for MUD STC. Check out my blog at www.greghankins.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Sun Jul 8, 2012, 04:58 AM
PattiDean PattiDean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 171
Thank you Greg for this post, I would be interested in knowing as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Sun Jul 8, 2012, 03:36 PM
kgtuck kgtuck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sylva & recently Waynesville, North Carolina USA
Posts: 47
Cool Treated with Dacogen

Greg - Very good question!! The dacogen has been my "wonder drug" for 3 years now, and think it was selected by "the toss of a coin". But, seriously, a PA working with my doctor had just attended a conference (June '09)and "heard that Dacogen's success rates were very good"! And, don't quote me, but I, in talking with others, seem to think Dacogen has less harsh side effects (mine being mild constipation, some slight fatigue and washed out feeling--for short periods of time--after the treatments every 4 weeks).
Dacogen can also bring down white counts, but for me, they bounce back up! I'm also glad to hear that there are combinations of drugs to try when needed!

One other note why Dacogen is preferred over Vidaza. The Dacogen schedule is alot more convenient for some patients. Dacogen is usually 5 days a week,
M-F, 1 hr per day, and I believe Vidaza is 7 day regimen, M-F and then Mon & Tues of the following week.
__________________
66 yr female;diag 6/09; MDS, unspecified, normal cytogenetics: blasts 10%; successful Dacogen;every 4th wk.; as of Aug.'12 changing to every 5th wk., stable at Hgb 12-14/platelets 200-300/wbc 2.-3.

Last edited by kgtuck : Sun Jul 8, 2012 at 10:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Mon Jul 9, 2012, 02:01 PM
DanL DanL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 590
Greg,

Great question. I think there are several possibilities, including the increased convenience noted previously. Some studies seem to imply greater transfusion independence:

http://www.mdsbeacon.com/news/2011/0...a-azacitidine/

For Decitabine, Complete Response numbers appear to be higher, but Overall Response Rate (including HI) is lower - 17% CR, 15% marrow CR, 18% HI. ORR is about 50%. Most responses seem to take place by the end of the second cycle, which is a little faster than with Azacitidine. Cytogenic responses also seem to be more common.

Vidaza studies have a lot of variability, but they seem to have a common theme of lower CR (7-12%) and PR (12%-16%), with higher rates of HI (37%), so a better overall response rate at around 60% on average. Vidaza seems to see a response by 3-4 months, though best response may not occur until 6-9 months.

Cost - Vidaza between 7k and 8k generally per cycle, Dacogen about $7600 per cycle - more or less the same.

Personally, I believe that the makers of Dacogen are being more aggressive in marketing the drug and getting it involved in more of the cutting-edge research with cure as an objective as opposed to maintenance, as it is being combined with some pretty strong chemo drugs in several trials. Most of the Vidaza trials appear to be a little more conservative and are looking for small gains. This could also be having an impact on perception of the drug.

One other note - some other research indicates that dacogen prior to stem cell transplant has lower AGVHD rates than Vidaza, but these have been very small studies - 20-30 people.
__________________
MDS RCMD w/grade 2-3 fibrosis. Allo-MUD Feb 26, 2014. Relapsed August 2014. Free and clear of MDS since November 2014 after treatment with Vidaza and Rituxan. Experiencing autoimmune attack on CNS thought to be GVHD, some gut, skin and ocular cGVHD. Neuropathy over 80% of body.

Last edited by DanL : Mon Jul 9, 2012 at 02:03 PM. Reason: additions
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Mon Jul 9, 2012, 08:30 PM
Greg H Greg H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 660
Hey Dan!

I knew you would come through for me. Your points make perfect sense. I do think the stance the drug company makes, in terms of participation in trials, visibility in sponsorships, etc. makes a difference in terms of what docs are more likely to prescribe.

And, given the number of posts I've read here about Vidaza side effects, anything that has fewer of those, and provokes a more rapid response, would certainly have a lot to recommend it.

Thanks for the education!

Take care,

Greg
__________________
Greg, 59, dx MDS RCMD Int-1 03/10, 8+ & Dup1(q21q31). NIH Campath 11/2010. Non-responder. Tiny telomeres. TERT mutation. Danazol at NIH 12/11. TX independent 7/12. Pancreatitis 4/15. 15% blasts 4/16. DX RAEB-2. Beginning Vidaza to prep for MUD STC. Check out my blog at www.greghankins.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Tue Jul 10, 2012, 02:14 AM
kris kris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AL
Posts: 50
Greg this is an interesting article just published

http://www.mdsbeacon.com/news/2012/0...mds-asco-2012/

So often transplant is offered after all other treatment options have been explored. This article is of interest.
__________________
Kris, wife of Rick. DX; MDS/ Ringed Siderblast 5/2006. Supportive care, then Vidaza x 25 mo. HSCT 11//1/11 doing GREAT!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No transplant Vidaza to Dacogen. julielucas MDS 9 Sun Jan 11, 2015 02:26 PM
Need help - Decitabine (Dacogen) questions Al's Wife MDS 21 Fri Aug 24, 2012 02:38 PM
Resistance to Dacogen Birgitta-A Drugs and Drug Treatments 0 Tue Aug 30, 2011 01:43 PM
Neupogen dependency from Dacogen? judy f. Drugs and Drug Treatments 4 Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:39 AM
The Doctor Came In Smileing Ear To Ear! anne&dean Drugs and Drug Treatments 2 Sun Jan 4, 2009 01:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forum sites may contain non-authoritative and unverified information.
Medical decisions should be made in consultation with qualified medical professionals.
Site contents exclusive of member posts Copyright © 2006-2020 Marrowforums.org